On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Eric Covener <cove...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 5:31 AM, Kalyana sundaram <kalyan...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> > I am using httpd-2.2.26. Whenever I use LimitRequestBody directive Apache
> > gives 413 to user if content length is greater than the value specified
> in
> > directive but logs as 200. It even appends the response html along with
> > error document. This problem happens in httpd-2.4.4 also
> > On further debugging 2.2.26 with gdb i found the problem occurs in
> > modules/http/http_request.c (ap_process_request) line 291
> >
> > if (access_status == OK) {
> >         ap_finalize_request_protocol(r);
> >     }
> >     else {
> >         r->status = HTTP_OK;
> >         ap_die(access_status, r);
> >     }
>
> What module are you using to write the response?  ap_die copies the
> first paraemter to r->status so you shouldn't need something special.
>
> But it doesnt happen like that. the client receives 413 but also the
response is appended to the error document
 <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN">
    <html><head>
    <title>413 Request Entity Too Large</title>
    </head><body>
    <h1>Request Entity Too Large</h1>
    The requested resource<br />/index.php<br />
    does not allow request data with POST requests, or the amount of data
provided in
    the request exceeds the capacity limit.
    <hr>
    <address>Apache/2.2.22 (Ubuntu) Server at localhost Port 8080</address>
    </body></html>
    <html>===>php response
    HOME
    </html>
The response is logged as 200. Could you try it out on a vhost and do a
simple curl to see it

> A 413 triggers an error reading the request body.  If you ignore it,
> things go wrong.  If you return the error you receive, it works.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Kalyanasundaram
http://blogs.eskratch.com/
https://github.com/kalyanceg/

Reply via email to