The order is always apr, expat and Lib before openssl before apr-util, plus
pcre before httpd.
On Nov 17, 2015 14:46, "David Long" <dl...@lynden.com> wrote:

> Hi William,
>
> Should I download apr-util first and compile it?
>
> I have not download apr-util and compile it on the system yet.
>
>
>
> Thanks for your help.
>
>
>
> David Long
>
>
>
> *From:* William A Rowe Jr [mailto:wr...@rowe-clan.net]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 17, 2015 11:36 AM
> *To:* users@httpd.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: [users@httpd] how to compile apache httpd 2.4.17
>
>
>
>
> On Nov 16, 2015 17:21, "David Long" <dl...@lynden.com> wrote:
> >
> > I download Apache httpd 2.4.17 and want compile on Solaris 10 Sparc.
> >
> > It ask me to install APR.
> >
> > So I download APR 1.5.2 and try to configure it and following error.
> >
> >
> >
> > root@kiana# cd /www/apachesrc/apr-1.5.2
> >
> > root@kiana# ./configure
> --prefix=/www/apachesrc/httpd-2.4.17/srclib/apr/configure
>
> Yuck...
>
> You are best off choosing the same --prefix for apr and apr-util as you
> intend to use for httpd itself.  Then tell apr-util and httpd the
> --with-apr=path so they install to the same place, e.g. /use/local or
> /opt/httpd as you like.
>
> >
> > checking build system type... sparc-sun-solaris2.10
> >
> > checking host system type... sparc-sun-solaris2.10
> >
> > checking target system type... sparc-sun-solaris2.10
> >
> > Configuring APR library
> >
> > Platform: sparc-sun-solaris2.10
> >
> > checking for working mkdir -p... yes
> >
> > APR Version: 1.5.2
> >
> > […]
> >
> > config.status: creating include/arch/unix/apr_private.h
> >
> > config.status: executing libtool commands
> >
> > libtoolT: No such file or directory
> >
> > config.status: executing default commands
> >
> > config.status: include/apr.h is unchanged
> >
> > config.status: include/arch/unix/apr_private.h is unchanged
> >
> >
> >
> > I do have libtool package installed but don't know what libtoolT means.
>
> This is new to me.  We bundle libtoolize with apr, you didn't need a
> system libtoolize.  However, maybe libtoolize fails to configure because it
> can't work out your gcc/cc/ld?
>

Reply via email to