On 6/14/2016 at 9:42 PM, "Mathijs Schmittmann" <i...@mathijs.info> wrote: > >Hi Filipe, >> >> > Notice that SSLCertificateFile and SSLCertificateKeyFile are >the >> > same for both of the domains, because they use the same key of >> > example.com <http://example.com>. The website, example.com >> > <http://example.com> works perfectly fine. But example.info >> > <http://example.info> has serious problems (On the order of >> > NET::ERR_CERT_COMMON_NAME_INVALID). Who has an idea on how to >fix >> > this? I can't experiment too much because I'm limited to 5 >keys >> > per week so learning this myself is a very slow-track process. >You might find this interesting: >https://community.letsencrypt.org/t/testing-against-the-lets- >encrypt-staging-environment/6763 > >Letsencrypt provides a staging environment with much more lenient >ratelimiting, but of course not signed with the official >intermediate >certificate. >
I know it exists in theory, but have no clue on how to implement that. Doing this on my own machine is hard enough, then I have to undo the changes from the staging environment or have my present setup hosed, or insecure without my knowledge. I don't have the time to reinstall linux because of a botched config file somewhere. Encryption/security protocols are an obfuscated can of worms that can get ugly very quickly. >Br, >Mathijs --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
