Do you use a "similar" compiler for httpd and the module? On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 1:56 PM <singhal.an...@tcs.com> wrote: > > Hi All, > > Thank you Rick and William for helping me out. > > As suggested I had use the apxs to build a module. > Steps as follows: > > 1> I have commented my module and try to start the apache and it started. > > 2> I took the default example file that comes with > httpd-2.4.34(httpd-2.4.34/modules/examples/mod_example_hooks.c) and compile > it with apxs by following command: > apxs -c mod_example_hooks.c > > 3> Above command automatically created a folder .libs and in this there is > .so created(.libs/mod_example_hooks.so) > > 4> When I loaded the created module and try to start the apache then also it > is giving the same error. > > quartz: /usr/local/apache2.4.34/conf/extra > apache2.4 start > httpd: Syntax error on line 490 of /usr/local/apache2.4.34/conf/httpd.conf: > Syntax error on line 6 of > /usr/local/apache2.4.34/conf/extra/httpd-quartz.conf: API module structure > 'example_hooks_module' in file > /app/quartz/COMS/EAI_324/ph/http/src/.libs/mod_example_hooks.so is garbled - > expected signature 41503234 but saw 00000000 - perhaps this is not an Apache > module DSO, or was compiled for a different Apache version? > > > > Thanks & Regards > Ankit Singhal > Tata Consultancy Services > Mailto: singhal.an...@tcs.com > Website: http://www.tcs.com > ____________________________________________ > Experience certainty. IT Services > Business Solutions > Consulting > ____________________________________________ > > > > > From: "Houser, Rick" <rick.hou...@jackson.com> > To: "users@httpd.apache.org" <users@httpd.apache.org> > Date: 13-11-2018 14:40 > Subject: RE: [users@httpd] URGENT: Apache HTTP Migration from 1.3 to > 2.0 UNIX Solaris > ________________________________ > > > > "External email. Open with Caution" > > While that is one approach, I'm afraid it won't speed up your exercise; it is > most > direct to get 2.4 going. > > > Something that will likely speed your transition is to split your task into > as small of portions as possible, and tackle those one at a time from a > higher level perspective. For example, if a module is doing some custom > authentication, look at what’s available in 2.4 already and see if something > now stock can do the job, or at least get you 90% of the way there and serve > as an updated template for your code. For example, there are already modules > for authentication providers like ldap, content caching, database access, etc. > > The time savings on the simplified troubleshooting steps are likely to be far > from insignificant, and you would have the benefit of a more > standardized/modern codebase. For example, get the server up and running > with static content, then compile one module with apxs, get it to load, then > work on the related config. Work through any issues you find with this, then > move on to the next. This may be a good time to split one large config file > up in many smaller ones with includes, etc. Trying to migrate an existing > non-trivial site in one step is likely to be overwhelming for most, > especially for a novice. > > > Rick Houser > Web Engineer > > From: William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> > Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2018 12:18 > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: [users@httpd] URGENT: Apache HTTP Migration from 1.3 to 2.0 UNIX > Solaris > > EXTERNAL EMAIL > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 11:04 AM <singhal.an...@tcs.com> wrote: > > Our main objective is to migrate to 2.4. Since I faced an issue while doing > so, I thought it would be better to first migrate to 2.0 then to 2.2 and > finally to 2.4. > > While that is one approach, I'm afraid it won't speed up your exercise; it is > most > direct to get 2.4 going. > > In 2.4 itself the error is same. > > The signature created turns out to be 00000000. I could not understand this > part. I have gone through the internet and there are always some definite > signature is available but in my case it turned out to be 0. > > It is not a loadable library object. Rather than fighting with cc's flags, > review > the helper utility; > > https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/programs/apxs.html > > This will make your life much simpler for compiling and linking loadable > modules. It retains the flags initially used for compiling httpd and modules, > so that the results are consistent. > > =====-----=====-----===== > Notice: The information contained in this e-mail > message and/or attachments to it may contain > confidential or privileged information. If you are > not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, > review, distribution, printing or copying of the > information contained in this e-mail message > and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If > you have received this communication in error, > please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and > immediately and permanently delete the message > and any attachments. Thank you > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
-- Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
