Hi Ga�tan,

Because of the problem you just noticed IPv6 short format allows the "::" sequence to 
appear only once in an address.

I found it to be OK, because usually (if you follow assignment policies) you have many 
consecutive zeros only at the last 64 bits of the address.

--
Ran.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
> Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 05:26
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: IPV6 short format
> 
> Hi everyone,
> I have a question regarding IP V6.
> 
> Basically, it says in the CCNP material that if we have the 
> following adress:
> 
> 1080:0000:0000:0000:0008:0800:200C:417A
> 
> it can be shortened to :
> 
> 1080::8:800:200C:417A
> 
> I'm ok with that, however my concern is about an address such as:
> 1080:0000:0000:0000:0008:0000:0000:417A
> 
> it could be shortened to:
> 1080::8::417A   is that correct????
> 
> therefore once we are given this "1080::8::417A" address, how 
> do we know
> whether it is a shortcut for:
> 
> 1080:0000:0000:0000:0008:0000:0000:417A
> or
> 1080:0000:0000:0008:0000:0000:0000:417A
> 
> The only solution I can see is that maybe IPV6 would not 
> allow more than 4
> hexadecimal fields containing 0000...
> 
> anyone has an idea???
> 
> Thanks,
> ga�tan
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> The IPv6 Users Mailing List
> Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe users" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The IPv6 Users Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe users" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to