On 10 October 2014 09:37, <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Dan,
>
> thank you very much for your ultrafast answer !
>
> Yes, your answer helps but I'm not a 100% sure to go that way just because
> of the timeframe in my project
> and that seems to be some more generic work to do and I'm just a medium
> skilled programmer.
>

For simple view models we've just introduced (in 1.7.0-SNAPSHOT) the
@ViewModel annotation.  This will automatically create a view model for any
pojo, using the property getters and setters; no interface required.  But
that might not be sophisticated enough for your requirement.



>
> But nevertheless - perhaps I'll give it a try in my evening time hopefully
> not having to fight with my wife ;-)
>
> :-)



> Best Regards,
>
> Augustinus
>
> PS:
> By the way:
> I liked to read your book on nakedobjects - not just because it describes
> this idea coding-based but even more
> cause it teaches you clear OO- and dependency avoiding thinking !
>
>
Thanks.

The techniques I described in the book were just the standard dependency
inversion techniques, a la Uncle Bob et al.

Since writing the book, we've expanded the framework itself with fully
fleshed-out contributed properties and collections (as well as regular
contributed actions), and we've also introduced the event bus.  So fully
decoupled apps are now really easy to do.





> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Dan Haywood [mailto:[email protected]]
> Gesendet: Freitag, 10. Oktober 2014 10:12
> An: users
> Betreff: Re: Web-App with ISIS usings a (Soap) WebService (no persistence)
>
> Hi Augustinus,
>
> ... and welcome to the Isis mailing list.
>
> This idea has come up several times in various flavours, and it's
> certainly achievable.  Indeed, Kevin (one of our committers) is prototyping
> a system for his client which is conceptually similar... it loads its data
> out of an SCM (git or similar, I guess).
>
> David Tildesley, whose been working on a system down in NZ for a while,
> has also talked about something similar.
>
> And over in Ireland where I consult on the "sister" .NET system (running
> on Naked Objects MVC), we've used a variation of this architecture to
> bridge from a legacy client/server system to a new system based on NO MVC,
> where new functionality is built "natively" and existing functionality from
> the legacy system is exposed by wrapping each legacy entity as a view model.
>  (The variation is that the back-end of the legacy system runs in the same
> process space as the new system).
>
> The main issue you'll face is in constructing the mementos of the view
> models.  Currently the MementoService can only handle primitives and
> entities; in other words it isn't possible for a view model to reference
> another view model.  This might be an issue for you if you have a deep
> hierarchy/complex structure.  We've raised a ticket for this, but right now
> [1], but for the moment you're on your own to figure out a way to handle
> this.
>
> The other thing to be aware of is that, if you want your view models to be
> editable, then they need to implement the ViewModel.Cloneable
> subinterface.  That's because view models are immutable.
>
> And one final thing: there is a practical limit of 2083 chars for URLs,
> which impacts the length of a memento string.  The work-around is to have
> the memento refer to a GUID and store the state in an HttpSession or a
> distributed cache (if using the RO viewer).
>
> Hope that helps,
>
> Cheers
> Dan
>
>
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-915
>
>
> On 10 October 2014 08:48, <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I'd like to use ISIS for my Web-App (.war / Tomcat) but I don't need
> > all the persistence stuff cause I have to call a WebService instead of
> > that.
> >
> > My idea:
> >
> > -       Compile wsdl2java (using jdk wsimport now)
> > -       Enrich (merge in) the generated .java files with the
> > ViewModel-methods (deriving the classes from ViewModel)
> > -       Build services calling the webservice
> >
> > My questions:
> >
> > -       Is that idea a good one or should I go some other way ?
> > -       Is anybody out there who did that already willing to share some
> > experiences ?
> >
> > Basically I'd like to get all of ISIS but no persistence cause I have
> > very deep data-structures to be shown and edited in the UI which I
> > don't want to build up by means of Vaadin
> >
> > Any help or just little hints appreciated!
> > (Even "That's a stupid idea remarks" :-) )
> >
> > Augustinus Deimel
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to