Thanks Dan! I was referring to the format of the arguments. I dug into the Isis source code earlier and found that it attempts to determine the format of the arguments, so it would work either way and the client was not responsible for specifying what format the arguments were.
thanks, Kevin On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 8:56 AM, Dan Haywood <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > sorry not to reply sooner on this. > > The simple vs formal scheme relates to the representations that are > returned from a resource, not the representations of the arguments sent to > the resource. So, the format should be the same irrespective of which > scheme type your RO implementation supports. > > The relevant sections (of RO v1.0 spec) is 2.9 and 2.10. > > HTH > Dan > > > > On 28 May 2016 at 19:15, Kevin Lewandowski <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi, all. I'm working on an early python implementation of RO and had a > > question about passing arguments. > > > > In an Action Invoke resource, is there a way to tell if the client is > > sending arguments in the Simple scheme vs Formal Scheme? I can't find > this > > anywhere in the spec. > > > > thanks, > > > > Kevin > > >
