Yes, I'll do that ticket and one other. On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 7:30 PM, Dan Haywood <d...@haywood-associates.co.uk> wrote:
> There was a "bug fix" IIRC, that the mandatory indicator was missing in > some cases. > > Currently, whether a property is mandatory or not is independent from > whether it's read-only... what's editable or not varies on a per user > basis, whereas the fact that a property is mandatory is an invariant. > > That said, an improvement might be to suppress the mandatory indicator if > it is also read-only (on the grounds that the current user can do nothing > to change its state). > > would you like to raise a ticket to this effect? > > Cheers > Dan > > > On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 at 10:24 Stephen Cameron <steve.cameron...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I notice that the mandatory property 'red star' icon is appearing on the > > ends of property labels almost everywhere, even if an object is made > > read-only. > > > > I've not noticed it before in earlier versions. Any suggestions why? > > > > Thanks > > >
