Hi Brian, Apols for the delay.
First port of call - did you look at the docs on replacing page elements? [1] . [1] http://isis.apache.org/versions/1.16.2/guides/ugvw/ugvw.html#_ugvw_extending_replacing-page-elements (nb: this is for v1.16.2, it seems the v1.17.0 doc formatting is slightly messed up, but the content didn't change between these two versions, I think). <http://isis.apache.org/versions/1.16.2/guides/ugvw/ugvw.html#_ugvw_extending_replacing-page-elements> On Sun, 17 Nov 2019 at 05:36, Brian K <harvestmoon...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes that would be great! I'm seeing how much I can do with the wicket > viewer to make a fluid user experience. The Wicket project itself seems to > indicate a lot is possible. > > -Brian > > On Sat, Nov 16, 2019, 1:43 AM Dan Haywood <d...@haywood-associates.co.uk> > wrote: > > > Hi Brian, > > I agree, it is a bit clunky. I'm afraid it would require a new component > to > > be written. Contributions welcome, I can provide some guidance if you're > > willing. > > Cheers, > > Dan. > > > > On Fri, 15 Nov 2019, 19:52 Brian K, <harvestmoon...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > For 1.17 and 2.0, Boolean properties are displayed in the Wicket viewer > > > something like this: > > > > > > sample [X] Yes > > > > > > Clicking on the checkbox itself is disabled, while clicking on the text > > > next to it brings up an inline edit prompt (without the text) that > allows > > > you to click on the checkbox. > > > > > > Question: How can I have the property display with a simple checkbox, > > > similar to how it displays when editing inline? Is there a setting > > > somewhere or would this require coding a new wicket component? > > > > > > Thank you! > > > Brian > > > > > >
