Ahh. So the sequence would be: 1) check out NodeA (1.2) 2) check out NodeB (1.0) 3) add nodeC 4) checkin NodeB (1.1) 5) checkin NodeA (1.3)
Makes sense. Tobias Bocanegra wrote: > > well, you can't modify anything below NodeA whilst it is checked-in. > so, you would need to checkout NodeA (and NodeB) before you can add > NodeC. > but whenever you would restore version 1.2 of NodeA, you'll get the > exact same state when you created 1.2 (if NodeB has OPV=Copy). > > regards, toby > > On 8/17/06, JavaJ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Thanks! I read through the spec some more and it takes more sense now... >> >> One more question: >> >> Let's say you had a versionable NodeA (v1.2) with a versionable child >> node >> NodeB (v1.0), with attribute onParentVersion=COPY. You checkout NodeB >> and >> add a new non-versionable node NodeC (onParentVersion=COPY) to NodeB, >> then >> checkin a new version of NodeB (v1.1). Although the spec doesn't seem to >> specify what happens (if anything) to NodeA, I would think that the state >> of >> NodeA in the version storage of v1.2 would have to be updated to include >> NodeC as a new child of NodeB. OR NodeA would have to be automatically >> versioned to a new version v1.3 that includes NodeC as a child of NodeB. >> Otherwise, NodeA would be in an inconsistent state, because it would have >> a >> base version of v1.2 which points to a state of NodeA in version storage >> that does not include NodeC as a child of NodeB. Does that sound right? >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/More-questions-about-versioning-tf2117527.html#a5859080 >> Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users forum at Nabble.com. >> >> > > > -- > -----------------------------------------< [EMAIL PROTECTED] >--- > Tobias Bocanegra, Day Management AG, Barfuesserplatz 6, CH - 4001 Basel > T +41 61 226 98 98, F +41 61 226 98 97 > -----------------------------------------------< http://www.day.com >--- > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/More-questions-about-versioning-tf2117527.html#a5936368 Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users forum at Nabble.com.
