Michael, It depends. Will you in all case update all children node of an updated parent node?
If yes, you can simply delete them (with the initial parent node: both will be recreated). If no, well it will become tricky ;) Best Regards, Nico my blog! http://www.deviant-abstraction.net !! On 10/16/06, Daglian, Michael (IT) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Nico, Thanks for the detailed explanation! I believe the line number may be due to an older version of Jackrabbit being used (I got the trace from a colleague) so my apologies for sending you mixed information. I believe your assessment of the situation is correct: /test/foo has some children that do not allow same name siblings and are not autocreated. I also missed the line in the spec but I believe that it does validate the behavior I am seeing. All that being said, what is the workaround you suggest, assuming your description of the scenario? Best Regards, -- Mike
