Hi Joseph, Excellent ideas.
I could use the JCR test suite and add some stress testing (ie 10 000 nodes, importing XML). This way I could also compare different JCR implementation according to different needs + JR different PM (I am currently more interested in the Persistence Manager but this test suite can be easily exteneded later). What kind of stress test should be needed? Should I put this result on the wiki or on a different web site? Same question for the source code of the test? Nicolas On 10/25/06, Ottinger, Joseph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, what we should do is determine what operations should be tested - then we can create a benchmark fairly easily. Storing a node is easy enough; querying the node is easy enough; storing properties, too. Any other suggestions for common operations? And is anyone else considering commons-jcr for creating common operations for JCR? -----Original Message----- From: Alexandru Popescu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 12:53 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: PersistenceManagers Benchmark #: Nicolas changed the world a bit at a time by saying (astral date: 10/25/2006 4:07 PM) :# > Hi, > > I am wondering if someone benchmarked each Persistence Manager with > Jackrabbit? > > I would like to understand better which PM is the best for which use. > For instance I would have thought file based PM have an overall better > performance than RDBMS ones. But it seems I am wrong. Am I the only > one curious about this? > > If nobody did it, I can write one and put it back to the wiki if > anyone's interested. > > BR, > Nico > my blog! http://www.deviant-abstraction.net !! > Hi Nico! I would be very interested in seeing some results for this. Unfortunately I don't have any time now to invest into this (nor a clear idea how to do it). It would be great if you can create something, because afterwards I am quite sure people will start contributing to it. ./alex -- .w( the_mindstorm )p.
-- a+ Nico my blog! http://www.deviant-abstraction.net !!
