David Nuescheler schrieb:
Hi Shaun,
I agree that the behavior is slightly surprising.
It is according to the specification though, see section
8.4.8 Effect of a Lock / page 281
---
"Removing a node is considered an alteration of its parent. This
means that a locked node may be removed by any user with
sufficient access permissions as long as its parent node is not
locked. "
---
I agree that this may be counter intuitive and I would recommend
that you file a comment in the upcoming Public Review of JSR-283
if you think that the Expert Group should revisit its earlier rationale.
( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
...that would make locking more compatible with WebDAV locking.
Best regards, Julian
