Hi, On 4/24/07, Marcin Nowak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I can't share those files but I can give you some stats:
Your data set seems to primarily use tags instead of attributes for storing content. Jackrabbit nodes are quite a bit "heavier" than DOM nodes, which probably explains the difference in performance. As a rule of thumb I've sometimes used a rough metric that a Jackrabbit node is about an order of magnitude more expensive than a DOM node. I think we probably could improve this quite a bit. BR, Jukka Zitting
