On 9/4/07, Kaizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Thanks a lot. Actually earlier I was trying to add the node under nt:folder > and was getting the same exception, thats why i tried using the base node > type. Why cant i add the nodes with nt:folder as the node type and what > exactly is the cause of this exception?
please read "6.7 Node Types" in the JSR-170 specification which can be downloaded here: http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/final/jsr170/index.html you'll also find good introductory articles covering JCR and node type basics here: http://wiki.apache.org/jackrabbit/JcrLinks cheers stefan > > Thanks! > > > > > Stefan Guggisberg wrote: > > > > On 9/3/07, Kaizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> I am getting a similar exception on adding nodes. > >> > >> Node hello = root.addNode("hello","nt:base"); > >> Node world = hello.addNode("world","nt:base"); > >> > >> javax.jcr.nodetype.ConstraintViolationException: no definition found in > >> parent node's node type for new node: no matching child node definition > >> found for {}world: no matching child node definition found for {}world > >> > >> What should i do in this case? > > > > nt:base is not intended to be used directly as a node type. it serves as > > the > > root of the node type hierarchy and just defines the 2 properties common > > to all nodes: jcr:primaryType and jcr:mixinTypes. > > > > in your example, you could either omit the 2nd parameter (assuming the > > default) > > or specify an appropriate node type. nt:unstructured is the most > > generic node type, > > it allows any child nodes and any property of any type. > > > > Node hello = root.addNode("hello"); > > Node world = hello.addNode("world"); > > > > or > > > > Node hello = root.addNode("hello","nt:unstructured"); > > Node world = hello.addNode("world","nt:unstructured"); > > > > cheers > > stefan > > > >> > >> Thanks. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> JavaJ wrote: > >> > > >> > Given the following node types: > >> > > >> > [cm:myAppContainer] > nt:base,mix:referenceable,mix:versionable > >> > + cm:myApp (cm:myApp) = cm:myApp multiple version > >> > > >> > [cm:myApp] > nt:base,mix:referenceable,mix:versionable > >> > - cm:size (long) mandatory > >> > - cm:rules mandatory > >> > - cm:locale mandatory > >> > - cm:address mandatory > >> > > >> > I'm getting an error when I try to add a "myApp" child node to > >> > "myAppContainer". > >> > > >> > For example: > >> > > >> > // get the "myAppContainer" node > >> > Node container = rootNode.get("/nodes/myAppContainer"); > >> > > >> > // get the child node definitions to make sure it contains "myApp" > >> child > >> > node definition > >> > NodeDefinition[] defs = > >> > container.getPrimaryNodeType().getDeclaredChildNodeDefinitions(); > >> > > >> > // add a new "myApp" node > >> > newNode = container.addNode("myNewAppNode", "cm:myApp"); > >> > > >> > I get this error on this call: > >> > > >> > javax.jcr.nodetype.ConstraintViolationException: no definition found in > >> > parent node's node type for new node: > >> > no matching child node definition found for {}myNewAppNode: > >> > > >> > Is there something I'm doing wrong??? > >> > > >> > > >> > >> -- > >> View this message in context: > >> http://www.nabble.com/Problem-adding-a-child-node-tf2065497.html#a12463572 > >> Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Problem-adding-a-child-node-tf2065497.html#a12471478 > Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >
