Hello, Please excuse my ignorance, but I'm having to make some big decisions with very little time to fully understand the Jackrabbit product. I was hoping someone could help me get pointed in the right direction so I might continue investigating my options.
I'm planning on embedding Jackrabbit into a content management application that runs on a desktop. One requirement is to back up content is in real (enough) time. The underlying hardware will be configured such that there are two physical drives. When data is written to a master drive, I need it to write simultaneously to a slave drive. RAID is too inefficient because it may involve overhead from other applications running on the same device. However, I was wondering if observation as offered by Jackrabbit would be a good option. Right now I'm assuming binary data is written directly to the file system even when using "SimpleDbPersistenceManager". It's kind of a radical assumption on my part, but avoiding blobs seems to be a normal practice. Please correct me if I am wrong. If my assumption is correct, it doesn't seem like db level replication would be an option since it would miss the binary content. Your experience is very much appreciated. Lindsay -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Local-content-replication-tf4465166.html#a12731484 Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
