> Angela Schreiber wrote: > feel free to add SEARCH support to the simple-server.
You are really to generous for this world! :-) > that shouldn't be such a big deal (unless you are looking for > basic-search ;). I am ATM not sure wether I can translate DASL into SQL (or at least 95%)(XPATH). I think they don't totally match. Writing basic-search isn't to hard if I could translate it directly into lucene queries, but...this of course it not a very nice thing todo, because jackrabbit has this query grammar sets, but I really do not know how they work (not sure if i want to learn about javacc) :-) > up to know we (day) didn't have the need for search with the > simple server. that's why it's not supported yet. > > looking forward to seeing your code > angela Again, you are so generous ;) > > ps: > the SearchResource implementation in > o.a.j.webdav.jcr.SearchResource (jackrabbit-jcr-server > project) may give you some initial hints, how to add > Search-support to the simple-server. > > however, you should be aware that with the jcr-server each > Node object represents a dav-collection and each Property a > non-collection resource, whereas in the simple server the > mapping of Nodes to webDAV resources is defined by the > IO-handling and by the 'collections' entry in the > config.xml... that makes the difference requires more than > just copy/past. this just as a little remark. Thanks a lot Angela! -Ard >