On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 3:25 PM, amsmota <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hmm, actually I never looked at the BundleDbPersistenceManager, can you > elaborate a little on what it does and why is preferred over > DatabasePersistenceManager?
BundleDbPersistenceManager is the current default persistence manager. instead of storing every node and property separately (like SimpleDbPersistenceManager does) it stores a 'bundle' of the node and its properties in a single table row, thus significantly reducing network-roundtrips. cheers stefan > > Thanks. > > > > > > Stefan Guggisberg-2 wrote: > > > > On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 6:33 PM, amsmota <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> The reason I'm asking this is because I see that exists 4 sets of .ddl in > >> the > >> application, and I changed only 2, corresponding to the > >> DatabaseFileSystem / > >> DatabasePersistenceManager. What are this other 2 for? > >> > >> org.apache.jackrabbit.core.journal > > > > those are used by o.a.j.c.journal.DatabaseJournal. if you'e not using the > > clustering feature you don't have to care. > > > >> org.apache.jackrabbit.core.persistence.bundle > > > > those are used by o.a.j.c.persistence.bundle.BundleDbPersistenceManager > > and > > subclasses which are the (preferred) alternatives to > > DatabasePersistenceManager > > and subclasses. > > > > cheers > > stefan > > > >> > >> > >> > >> amsmota wrote: > >>> > >>> Do I have to be aware of other possible clashes besides > >>> DatabaseFileSystem > >>> / DatabasePersistenceManager ? > >>> > >> > >> -- > >> View this message in context: > >> > http://www.nabble.com/Use-of-diferent-or-same-schemaObjectPrefixes-tp17079492p17128109.html > >> Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Use-of-diferent-or-same-schemaObjectPrefixes-tp17079492p17208371.html > > > Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >
