Thanks! That links was very interesting ...not sure it gives a final
answer though.
IMO it would be consistent if neither would fail
Session s1 = ...
Session s2 = ...
String newPropName = Long.toString(System.currentTimeMillis());
s1.getRootNode().setProperty(newPropName, "1");
s2.getRootNode().setProperty(newPropName, "2");
s1.save();
s2.save();
Session s1 = ...
Session s2 = ...
s1.getRootNode().setProperty("b", "0");
s1.save();
s1.getRootNode().setProperty("b", "1");
s2.getRootNode().setProperty("b", "2");
s1.save();
s2.save();
at least not from my user's perspective. Unless you ask for such information.
Requiring a lock/transaction to prevent unexpected behavior sounds fair.
cheers
--
Torsten
