On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 6:50 PM, Kenneth Yue<[email protected]> wrote: > Any ideas? I'm beginning to think this may be a bug. > org.apache.jackrabbit.jcr2spi.RepositoryImpl.java expects a > javax.naming.spi.ObjectFactory implementation, but I looked over the entire > Jackrabbit workspace and found only the following classes implement > javax.naming.spi.ObjectFactory: > > org.apache.jackrabbit.core.jndi.BindableRepositoryFactory > org.apache.jackrabbit.jcr2spi.RepositoryImpl$Factory > org.apache.jackrabbit.rmi.client.ClientRepositoryFactory > > BindableRepositoryFactory and ClientRepositoryFactory are unrelated to > WebDAV. RepositoryImpl$Factory is, well, the code that's doing the > checking, So is the code looking for itself??? How does the code expect > users to use it? Does the code expect users to write their own > ObjectFactory implementation and plug it in? Then how exactly is > org.apache.jackrabbit.client.RepositoryFactoryImpl useful? > > What do you all think? Thanks.
Maybe this thread helps: http://markmail.org/message/4oy65gmvjttg42ht Regards, Alex -- Alexander Klimetschek [email protected]
