2010/2/26 François Cassistat <[email protected]>:
> Hmm, this is weird.
>
> If I use session.getNode("/path/to/some/node"); at start, it works in 2 
> seconds
>
> If I use session.getNode("/"); it takes 25 seconds...

are you using jcr2spi? if yes, how did you configur your jcr client?

cheers
stefan

>
> Under /, there is only two nodes (jcr:system) and my application root node.
>
> Once found, I get the root in 0ms, but maybe it is cached.
>
>
> F
>
>
> Le 2010-02-26 à 2:26 PM, François Cassistat a écrit :
>
>> Rakesh,
>>
>> Each time I create a connection and get the root node.
>>
>> After that, each access to a node seems a little slow, so querying and 
>> fetching the 1500 nodes described below take one or two minutes, but maybe 
>> decreasing the number of nodes could help. But here, nothing as dramatic as 
>> 27 seconds for one node.
>>
>>
>> F
>>
>>
>> Le 2010-02-26 à 2:14 PM, Rakesh Vidyadharan a écrit :
>>
>>>
>>> On 26 Feb 2010, at 12:51, François Cassistat wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks Rakesh for your reply,
>>>>
>>>> actually root have only one node, below 2 or 3 levels of that of that 
>>>> there is one node with 1500 nodes, this is the maximum. All other nodes 
>>>> have between 0 and 10 nodes.
>>>>
>>>> 1500 may be a lot and I may implements a tree strategy to decrease the 
>>>> number of child of this node. But does that sub-sub-sub-sub-node make the 
>>>> getRootNode() going that slow?
>>>
>>> No, that should not affect the root node retrieval.  Is the time to access 
>>> repeatable, or just the first time?
>>>
>>> Rakesh
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> F
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Le 2010-02-26 à 1:16 PM, Rakesh Vidyadharan a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 26 Feb 2010, at 11:32, François Cassistat wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I have inserted ~25K nodes with ~1500 files (about 1.6G of files) and 
>>>>>> now Jackrabbit takes 27 seconds to get the root node, is it normal? 
>>>>>> Maybe it is because am I using the standalone server (2.0)? Also I am 
>>>>>> making tests since jcr2spi.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm a newbie with JackRabbit configuration files, so I did not make much 
>>>>>> modifications to repository.xml
>>>>>
>>>>> In my experience the biggest issue is the number of child nodes under a 
>>>>> parent (and not repository configuration).  The general recommendation is 
>>>>> to try and keep child nodes low (1000 does not seem too bad in my 
>>>>> experience), but not 25K under a single parent.
>>>>>
>>>>> Rakesh
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to