Hi Chad, that's a good statement and matters much to me. I am a friend of standarized usages (because it's most economic). Thanks for that. And if workspaces are not designed for that, I won't use them for that.
Best regards, Ulrich -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: ChadDavis [mailto:[email protected]] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 17. März 2010 17:40 An: [email protected] Betreff: Re: Workspace - concept On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Cech. Ulrich <[email protected]> wrote: > Thank you very much for the links. I knew already DavidsModel-Page, but it > was a bit theoretical, so I hoped, that I could get some "real-life" > experiences of what would be the right approach. I don't know if this counts as a "real life" issue . . . The workspace usage you describe in #1 is clearly not a common practice in the Jackrabbit community. I've found that departures from the way the community is using Jackrabbit can quickly lead you into a less finished part of the software. Perhaps this doesn't matter to you, but my experiences with Jackrabbit are: 1) good software 2) the farther you stray from the standard community usage patterns, the more time you can expect to spend figuring it out for yourself and debugging
