On 16 August 2010 19:18, Davide Maestroni <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, it could definitely be the same issue, and I see that unfortunately no > one fixed it... > Do you happen to know any workaround? I tried to look into Jackrabbit 2.1.0. > but I could not find any major modifications in the related classes. > This is a real show stopper in case I want to change the node type > definitions of an existing repository.
It cannot be recommend to use schemas for JCR repositories when using jackrabbit due to this and other limitations on schema changes. -- -Tor
