2010/11/27 Fabián Mandelbaum <[email protected]>: > Well, indeed I've heard that recommendation over and over again... but > did you make tests with thousands of nodes and got bad performance? Or,
You don't need to test this as this is commonly know already. You will get bad performance. > I don't know about the 'cost' of doing such tests though, but I'd try > 'em quickly because using the ID directly as the 'key' is far simpler > than manipulating the ID everytime (which is also time consuming, even > if computers do compute very fast). I cannot say that it doesn't cost time, because obviously it does cost some cpu cycles, but this won't be noticeable at all. Creating the idea is like 1 billionth of the time it takes to actually create the folders. I don't think the random folder structure is a bad idea. You can also create the user 123 below /users/1/2/3 Furthermore, I don't think you should store the jcr path back into the database of the created user! You can much better store the identifier of the created user node. Regards Ard > > Just an idea. I'll let other, more experienced, JackRabbit guys jump in > here if they have better ideas (I'm sure some will). > > El 27/11/10 08:50, danisevsky escribió: >> Users may be tens of thousands and I think it is recomended "go deep" >> instead of "go wide". >>
