On 29.11.10 12:47, "Seidel. Robert" <[email protected]> wrote:
>I think, the use-case is the same, that we have:: > >Multi cluster environment - only one single Lucene index within the >database for all nodes would > -> takes less disk space (if you have more than one node) > -> make backups easier (you only have to backup the database, not the >db and some folders on three nodes) > -> makes it easier to add nodes (you don't have to wait, until the >index is built up) > -> make the index more stable (because the database is transactional) Ok, makes sense, but this would be an optimization purely for writes. I would expect that the benefits are completely offset by the much worse read performance of this setup. Regards, Alex -- Alexander Klimetschek Developer // Adobe (Day) // Berlin - Basel
