I don't think so, As i understand it, it is used as a prefix to build the names of the Jackrabbit tables and indexes.
Ex : JCR_MYPREFIX_BINVAL JCR_MYPREFIX_BUNDLES But it is does not look like the Oracle Schema. Regards, Lauretn -----Message d'origine----- De : Seidel. Robert [mailto:[email protected]] Envoyé : mardi 25 janvier 2011 09:22 À : [email protected] Objet : AW: RE : configFile vs repository.xml Hi Laurent, schemaObjectPrefix should do the job. /** * Sets the schema object prefix. This string is used to prefix all schema * objects, like tables and indexes. this is useful, if several persistence * managers use the same database. * * @param schemaObjectPrefix the prefix for schema objects. */ Regards, Robert -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: PREVOSTO, Laurent [mailto:[email protected]] Gesendet: Montag, 24. Januar 2011 21:57 An: [email protected] Betreff: RE: RE : configFile vs repository.xml Now that i eventually understood, here comes the final question : With the Oracle BundleDB PM, is there a way to specify a schema for the jackrabbit tables (ie : not the schema that matches the oracle connection login). Regards, Laurent -----Message d'origine----- De : Seidel. Robert [mailto:[email protected]] Envoyé : lundi 24 janvier 2011 15:34 À : [email protected] Objet : AW: RE : configFile vs repository.xml Hi Laurent, yes you are - the workspace settings in repository.xml are just default values if there is no existing workspace.xml. However the workspace.xmls will be created at the first access. Regards, Robert -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: PREVOSTO, Laurent [mailto:[email protected]] Gesendet: Montag, 24. Januar 2011 14:13 An: [email protected] Betreff: RE: RE : configFile vs repository.xml Hi Jukka, I had read this documentation. But just to make it clear, the rule should be : If I want to modify something regarding workspace configuration (in my case, the way you connect to the PM database), you should : 1. modify repository.xml (in case you create new workspaces) 2. modify existings workspace.xml (1) only would be useless. Am I right ? Regards, Laurent -----Message d'origine----- De : Jukka Zitting [mailto:[email protected]] Envoyé : lundi 24 janvier 2011 12:59 À : [email protected] Objet : Re: RE : configFile vs repository.xml Hi, On 23.01.2011 22:45, PREVOSTO, Laurent wrote: > But does anybody know which are repository level and workspace level > configurations ? Or is it documented somewhere ? See http://jackrabbit.apache.org/jackrabbit-configuration.html -- Jukka Zitting
