Thanks a lot Lukas, sounds very interesting! I will check it for sure! 2011/9/16 Lukas Kahwe Smith <[email protected]>
> > On Sep 16, 2011, at 14:50 , Francisco Carriedo Scher wrote: > > > Hi there, > > > > i have been checking the Wiki section about clustering and users' mailing > > listthe as well. I am missing some info about what clustering Jackrabbit > > will provide and what not. > > > > It will provide _fault tolerance_ through journaling but, is this feature > > really mature? I read that there are issues regarding to > de-synchronisation > > between journaling and file datastore state, too frequent sync delay > causes > > issues too, it is needed to fine tune the configuration enlarging cache > > size... > > at liip we are using rdbms data store (with mysql) and have come up with > the following solution to be able to globally distribute our cluster nodes: > > http://blog.liip.ch/archive/2011/05/04/how-to-make-jackrabbit-globally-distributable-fail-safe-and-scalable-in-one-go.html > > > It will _not_ provide built in load balancing so, the only option i see > so > > far is to access Jackrabbit through Webdav and use Apache webserver to > > balance the requests along all the clustered nodes. Again, is this the > best > > way and are there any critical issues that i must consider? > > i should note that we access jackrabbit via davex and so we use a standard > load balancer to direct the davex requests. our client lib adds a random > header to each request which the load balancer uses to determine which > jackrabbit node to redirect the traffic to. > > regards, > Lukas Kahwe Smith > [email protected] > > > >
