Hi, On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 3:42 AM, David Buchmann <[email protected]> wrote: > i don't see how this can be valid. is this a bug? is this file never > parsed by jackrabbit? or do you use a different parser that adds this > behaviour?
The trick here is that the parser allows "multiple" to be used as a synonym of "sns" in child node definitions, see [1]. It's a Jackrabbit-specific convention that dates back to before the CND format was included (and cleaned up) in the JCR spec. [1] https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit/blob/trunk/jackrabbit-jcr-commons/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/commons/cnd/Lexer.java#L54 [2] http://jackrabbit.apache.org/node-type-notation.html BR, Jukka Zitting
