Hello, we skipped OCM right from the start due to its limited functionality and went with Jcrom instead.
While that had been abandoned somebody else has picked up the project meanwhile and version 2.1 has been released in June 2013. We made a few improvements ourselves but in general I am quite happy with the value it offers. Viele Grüße Thomas Auinger Beratung und Leitung Entwicklung ByteConsult GmbH | Tel.: +49-(0)931-20510-20 | AG Würzburg, HRB 7262 Schürerstraße 5 | Fax: +49-(0)931-20510-19 | GF: Jens Helmerich 97080 Würzburg | http://www.byteconsult.de | Manuel Hermann -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Ulrich Scheidegger [mailto:[email protected]] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 23. April 2014 06:19 An: [email protected] Betreff: Re: Is OCM a Dead Project? Hi Peter Interest in OCM has not been very high. We have written a module for the Magnolia CMS to make use of OCM and therefore would also like to see OCM live. But I have not heard of too many others using it. So, I cannot tell you anything about the status of OCM other than letting you know that we're using it as well. -will On 23.04.2014, at 05:56, Peter Harrison <[email protected]> wrote: > A number of months ago I attempted to contribute some code that provided a > way to map a List to the properties of a single Node to the ORM project. This > only works for arrays of primitives of course, but was quite useful to me, > and others I noted were asking for similar functionality. > > I have tried to follow the process of issue tracker submission and attaching > my code but I note that the OCM project has had no commits whatsoever > since... well as long as I have been watching since at least September last > year. > > I'm using Jackrabbit in anger (aka - not just playing, we are doing serious > projects) but I am concerned that the code base of OCM has been abandoned. > This doesn't bode well for the rest of the codebase. I'm happy to contribute > and help, but there has been no replies to my queries about progress on > commiting my contributions. > > Perhaps my code is junk or I'm taking the wrong approach, or there is a > better way, but I'm not really getting the impression I'm welcome. I realise > people are busy, but this is wasting the opportunity to involve experienced > developers who are keen to help. I'm not beating up on anyone - I just would > like to get more involved in this great project. > > Thanks, > Peter
