Hi all,

we are doing many stress tests over our web application above jackrabbit 2.14.0.

Starting from a given load, we are experiencing big differences between 4 nodes 
versus 2 nodes, I mean that 2 nodes result much more performant than 4 ones.

We use Oracle 12, only one db node, our PersistenceManager is configured in 
this way:

<PersistenceManager 
class="org.apache.jackrabbit.core.persistence.pool.OraclePersistenceManager">
    <param name="dataSourceName" value="ds1"/>
    <!-- The size of the bundle cache in megabytes, the default is 8 -->
    <param name="bundleCacheSize" value="512"/>
    <param name="consistencyCheck" value="false"/>
    <!-- This size defines the threshold of which size a property is included 
in the bundle or is stored in the blob store, it is in bytes -->
    <param name="minBlobSize" value="16384"/>
    <param name="schemaObjectPrefix" value="${wsp.name}_"/>
</PersistenceManager>

Have you some hints or best practices to suggest when configure a Jackrabbit 
cluster?

We have noticed that the most active statement is this:
update JOURNAL_GLOBAL_REVISION set REVISION_ID = REVISION_ID + 1

For which reason it was choosen to have a simple NUMBER column to manage such 
an important information? It is really massively accessed and it may generate a 
big bottle-neck in high concurrency, am I wrong?


Thanks in advance, best regards







[westpole]

Raffaele Gambelli

WebRainbow(r) Software Developer


P:      +39 051 8550 576
M:      #
E:      [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
W:      https://westpole.webex.com/meet/R.Gambelli
A:      Via Ettore Cristoni, 84 - 40030 Casalecchio di Reno


[www]<https://westpole.it/>     [facebook] 
<https://www.facebook.com/WESTPOLESPA>       [twitter] 
<https://twitter.com/WESTPOLE_SPA>    [linkedin] 
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/westpole>

This email for the D.lgs.196/2003 (Privacy Code) and European Regulation 
679/2016/UE (GDPR) may contain confidential and/or privileged information for 
the exclusive use of the intended recipient. Any review or distribution by 
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, you must 
not use, copy, disclose or take any action based on this message or any 
information here. If you have received this email in error, please contact us 
(email:[email protected]) by reply email and delete all copies. Legal 
privilege is not waived because you have read this email. Thank you for your 
cooperation.
[green]

Reply via email to