Yes, TDB is much faster than SDB in my benchmarking. On May 25, 2013, at 5:57 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> On 24/05/13 23:17, David Jordan wrote: >> >> Yes. >> >> On May 24, 2013, at 5:43 PM, Cindy A McMullen wrote: >> >>> I've used quads and named graphs with TDB, but don't see any documentation >>> indicating that SDB supports them. Does SDB support quads and named graphs? >> > > Cindy - given you've used TDB, what's the interest in SDB? (It's slower and > scales less well.) > > Andy
