Hello Milorad, you should not create URIs in other peoples namespaces without their permission.
So best practice would be "d1:R rdf:type d2:C2". Regards, Michael Brunnbauer On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 06:00:27PM -0700, Milorad Tosic wrote: > Hi, > > The question may be somewhat out of focus of the group but since we have here > a number of competent people I dared to post the question here. > > > Let us given an ontology O1 under development that has assigned domain "d1:". > So, we have ownership of O1. For development of the O1 we find useful to use > some knowledge defined in an ontology O2 with domain "d2:". Note that the O2 > is an externally defined ontology not in our administration scope. Let's now > assume we want to create a resource that would be an individual from the > class "d2:C", where the class is defined in O2. > > What should be best practice to do: "d1:R rdf:type d2:C2" or "d2:R rdf:type > d2:C2"? > > I believe both are conceptually correct statements but I am not sure whether > the second statement is in accordance with Linked Data principles. > > Thanks, > Milorad Tosic -- ++ Michael Brunnbauer ++ netEstate GmbH ++ Geisenhausener Straße 11a ++ 81379 München ++ Tel +49 89 32 19 77 80 ++ Fax +49 89 32 19 77 89 ++ E-Mail bru...@netestate.de ++ http://www.netestate.de/ ++ ++ Sitz: München, HRB Nr.142452 (Handelsregister B München) ++ USt-IdNr. DE221033342 ++ Geschäftsführer: Michael Brunnbauer, Franz Brunnbauer ++ Prokurist: Dipl. Kfm. (Univ.) Markus Hendel
pgpwqqEopFlkN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
