thank you for your tipps, will try them out right away!

best,
Walt


On 04/18/2014 05:10 PM, Joshua TAYLOR wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 7:08 PM, wk <[email protected]> wrote:
>> ok, i think i got it. funny thing is, i found your stackoverflow answer to a 
>> similar question.
>> so i basically did the following:
>>
>>         model = ModelFactory.createDefaultModel();
>>         File dir = new File(directory);
>>         File[] directoryListing = dir.listFiles();
>>         if (directoryListing != null) {
>>             for (File child : directoryListing) {
>>                 if(child.toString().endsWith("rdf") || 
>> child.toString().endsWith("RDF")) {
>>                     Model m = 
>> ModelFactory.createDefaultModel().read(child.toString());
>>                     model.add( m );
>>                 }
>>             }
>>         }
>>
>> then without saving i use the model to perform my queries at. this should be 
>> it, shouldn't it?
> I don't know that
>
>>                 if(child.toString().endsWith("rdf") || 
>> child.toString().endsWith("RDF")) {
> is quite as robust as it could be;  there are other common extensions
> for files that have RDF content.  In RDF/XML serialization, you'll
> typically see .rdf or .owl (when it's an RDF/XML serialization of an
> OWL ontology), but there's also N3/Turtle (.n3, .ttl), and N-Triples
> (.nt).  Even if you only want things ending with .rdf, it'd probably
> be more sensible to the getName() method, and you consider normalizing
> the case and checking against that:
>
> child.getName().toLowerCase().endsWith("rdf");
> otherwise, you'd miss things like .RdF, .rDF, etc.  Also, you don't
> need to create a new model for each file, since the model.add( m )
> call is just taking the triples from m and adding them to model.  You
> can just do
>
> for ( File child : directoryListing ) {
>   if ( child.getName().toLowerCase().endsWith("rdf") ) {
>     model.read( child.getAbsolutePath() );
>   }
> }
>
> //JT
>
>> On 04/15/2014 10:22 PM, wk wrote:
>>
>> sorry, i forgot to reply to the full list.
>>
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: Re: jena api - typos and TDB
>> Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 22:20:02 +0200
>> From: wk <[email protected]>
>> To: [email protected]
>>
>>
>> hello Joshua,
>>
>> thx for reply. i really need some help here.
>> the context is the following. i need to build a RESTful service where
>> someone can upload RDF files and then query the information. the upload
>> is already implemented, now i need to be able to query those RDF files
>> (all in one folder) programatically through the jena api. i already
>> managed to query one specific RDF file successfully, however i need to
>> implement the case where i don't know exactly the number and the name of
>> these RDF files which should all be in one folder. is this information
>> helpful?
>>
>> best regards,
>> Walt
>>
>> On 04/15/2014 10:11 PM, Joshua TAYLOR wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 3:53 PM, wk <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> however, im trying to use TDB, is this the appropriate tool to combine
>>>> several rdf files to be able to query them all at the same time?
>>> This is a rather broad question, and I think you'll need to provide a
>>> bit more context.  In one sense, the easiest way to combine a bunch of
>>> RDF graphs and execute SPARQL queries over them would be to use Jena's
>>> rdfcat command line utility to combine them, and Jena's sparql command
>>> line utility to execute the queries.  Some more context will help to
>>> determine what's a good fit for your situation, though.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to