Hi, Thanks for your answer.
Isn't there any way to avoid String concatenation/substitution when creating delete/insert queries? I'm looking for something like this: Update update = new Update(); update.setQueryInsertDeleteType(); ElementGroup group = new ElementGroup(); // .... update.setQueryPattern(group); // set WHERE BasicPattern basicPattern = new BasicPattern(); // .... update.setDeletePattern(new Template(basicPattern)); // set DELETE // .... update.setInsertPattern(new Template(basicPattern)); // set INSERT If this is currently not possible, I'll go with the Strings. But I want to avoid this as much as possible. Thanks, Maarten > Op 9-mrt.-2015, om 23:42 heeft Trevor Donaldson <tmdona...@gmail.com> het > volgende geschreven: > > Take a look at parameterizedsparqlstring. That is a good place to start. > On Mar 9, 2015 6:25 PM, "Maarten van Dessel" <maarten.vandes...@ugent.be> > wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> I'm already familiar with the programmatic creation of SPARQL construct >> queries: >> >> Query query = new Query(); >> query.setQueryConstructType(); >> >> ElementGroup group = new ElementGroup(); >> // .... >> query.setQueryPattern(group); // set WHERE clause >> >> BasicPattern basicPattern = new BasicPattern(); >> // .... >> query.setConstructTemplate(new Template(basicPattern)); // set CONSTRUCT >> clause >> >> Is it however possible to create SPARQL 1.1 Delete & Insert queries in the >> same manner? >> I know Jena is capable of parsing sparql query-strings, but I can't figure >> out how to create them >> programmatically by using the same constructs as above. >> >> Thanks in advance, >> >> Maarten
