Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> wrote on 19-02-2016 21:23:44:

> On 19/02/16 19:22, Bart van Leeuwen wrote:
> > Thanks for the reply,
> >
> > In other words I would need to use plain HTTP connections for now, or
> > would the RDF Connection be ready for production ?
> 
> <In a purely individual capacity>
> I would hope it is ready for use.

Can I mix it with standard jena ?

> Or you could lift the few lines it takes (it uses the same code as Jena 
> for HTTP) to use HTTP directly. Open source!
> 
>    Andy
> 
> >
> > Met Vriendelijke Groet / With Kind Regards
> > Bart van Leeuwen
> >
> > ##############################################################
> > # twitter: @semanticfire
> > # netage.nl
> > # http://netage.nl
> > # Esdoornstraat 3
> > # 3461ER Linschoten
> > # tel. +31(0)6-53182997
> > ##############################################################
> >
> >
> >
> > From:   Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org>
> > To:     users@jena.apache.org
> > Date:   19-02-2016 18:32
> > Subject:        Re: Quad put and post with DatasetGraphAccessorHTTP
> >
> >
> >
> > On 19/02/16 15:13, Bart van Leeuwen wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I want to be able to send quads to a Jena Fuseki endpoint as well as
> >> Dydra.
> >> Both support the same mechanism, just set the correct content type 
and
> >> send the quads.
> >>
> >> Is there a class available that assists me with this ?
> >
> > Not properly yet. I've proposed "RDF Connection" which is not in the
> > Jena codebase at the moment.
> >
> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/jena-dev/201510.mbox/%
> 3C56126B45.30006%40apache.org%3E
> >
> >
> > code:
> > https://github.com/afs/jena-rdfconnection/
> >
> >      Andy
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 

Reply via email to