Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> wrote on 19-02-2016 21:23:44: > On 19/02/16 19:22, Bart van Leeuwen wrote: > > Thanks for the reply, > > > > In other words I would need to use plain HTTP connections for now, or > > would the RDF Connection be ready for production ? > > <In a purely individual capacity> > I would hope it is ready for use.
Can I mix it with standard jena ? > Or you could lift the few lines it takes (it uses the same code as Jena > for HTTP) to use HTTP directly. Open source! > > Andy > > > > > Met Vriendelijke Groet / With Kind Regards > > Bart van Leeuwen > > > > ############################################################## > > # twitter: @semanticfire > > # netage.nl > > # http://netage.nl > > # Esdoornstraat 3 > > # 3461ER Linschoten > > # tel. +31(0)6-53182997 > > ############################################################## > > > > > > > > From: Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> > > To: users@jena.apache.org > > Date: 19-02-2016 18:32 > > Subject: Re: Quad put and post with DatasetGraphAccessorHTTP > > > > > > > > On 19/02/16 15:13, Bart van Leeuwen wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I want to be able to send quads to a Jena Fuseki endpoint as well as > >> Dydra. > >> Both support the same mechanism, just set the correct content type and > >> send the quads. > >> > >> Is there a class available that assists me with this ? > > > > Not properly yet. I've proposed "RDF Connection" which is not in the > > Jena codebase at the moment. > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/jena-dev/201510.mbox/% > 3C56126B45.30006%40apache.org%3E > > > > > > code: > > https://github.com/afs/jena-rdfconnection/ > > > > Andy > > > > > > > > >