Yes, still using Jena 2, to be precise, v2.13.0
________________________________
From: Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 3:19:17 PM
To: users@jena.apache.org
Subject: Re: got exception on specific query
Which version are you using?
> com.hp.hpl.jena.
Jena2, not Jena3.
Andy
On 21/06/16 16:11, Zen 98052 wrote:
>
> What puzzling me more, the code currently being deployed actually never
> passed that second arg, but it doesn't throw exception.
>
> The Jena API version is same, I made some changes at other places, but not on
> that particular code. This is so weird..
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Zen 98052 <z98...@outlook.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 11:00:37 AM
> To: users@jena.apache.org
> Subject: got exception on specific query
>
> Hi,
>
> I got exception when calling QueryFactory.create(query); where query is
> following:
>
>
> PREFIX v: <http://b/dir/>
> PREFIX rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#>
>
> SELECT (COUNT(?idObj) AS ?idCount) WHERE
> {
> {
> SELECT ?person ?idObj WHERE
> {
> ?person v:hasUniqueID ?idObj .
> }
> }
> ?person v:hasDataContext ?dc .
> ?dc v:metadataID "foobar" .
> }
>
>
> The exception I got is:
>
> com.hp.hpl.jena.query.QueryParseException:
> com/hp/hpl/jena/sparql/util/PrefixMapping2
> at
> com.hp.hpl.jena.sparql.lang.ParserSPARQL11.perform(ParserSPARQL11.java:118)
> at
> com.hp.hpl.jena.sparql.lang.ParserSPARQL11.parse$(ParserSPARQL11.java:53)
> at com.hp.hpl.jena.sparql.lang.SPARQLParser.parse(SPARQLParser.java:34)
> at com.hp.hpl.jena.query.QueryFactory.parse(QueryFactory.java:148)
> at com.hp.hpl.jena.query.QueryFactory.create(QueryFactory.java:80)
> at com.hp.hpl.jena.query.QueryFactory.create(QueryFactory.java:53)
> at com.hp.hpl.jena.query.QueryFactory.create(QueryFactory.java:41)
> ...
>
>
> However, when I pass the syntax arg, i.e. QueryFactory.create(query,
> Syntax.syntaxARQ); then it works fine.
>
> Without passing syntax, it'd use Syntax.defaultQuerySyntax, which resolves to
> Syntax.syntaxSPARQL_11
>
> Though it is working now, but I wonder if this is safe option? If not, what
> is the workaround?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Z
>
