Andy, I need some points in which SPARQL query can be better than rules to get the desired result?
Is it fast (in terms of time) than jena rules to be executed by the engine? Second, in terms of expressiveness, how SPARQL is better than the rules? One point I think is jena rules does not support dis-junction while SPARQL does (UNION). , On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 2:07 PM, Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> wrote: > This has been asked before, most recently 2017-08-14. > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ae4c1f5dfbacfb9bf4294a4 > cf2967e0c7050c81b20f80e6c425a9aa8@%3Cusers.jena.apache.org%3E > > Please search the archives before asking questions. > > Andy > > On 24/08/17 08:50, tina sani wrote: > >> What are some of advantages of SPARQL over (Jena) rules? I know only that >> SPARQL is W3C recommendation and jena rules are not. Similarly, Jena rules >> are monotonic which does not add/remove any data just infer new knowledge. >> How SPARQL is more expressive than rules? >> >> If we get some inference using SPARQL, how it differs (better) than >> inference using rules. >> >> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source >> =link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon> >> Virus-free. >> www.avast.com >> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source >> =link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link> >> <#m_-5991634784996563873_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> >> >>
