Thanks DiogoHowever, I think it is not possible to compare OWL or OWL
reasoning with SPARQL.What was in my mind when I asked the question is to
compare Rule-based reasoning with SPARQL.
ThanksAbdul
On Friday, 6 October 2017, 15:40:33 GMT+1, Diogo FC Patrao
<djogopat...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi
Please forgive any mistakes below.
SPARQL is a language to deal with data; OWL is meant to deal with concepts.
You may argue that both can produce the same results. However there is an
important difference: the language.
As using owl one may represent both concepts and their relations in the
same language, it allows producing new relations. I think you can't do that
on SPARQL.
Sure SPARQL may be faster and may even yield results impossible in OWL, but
it is similar to write code in any programming language.
Cheers
Em 6 de out de 2017 11:09, "Abduladem Eljamel"
<a_elja...@yahoo.co.uk.invalid> escreveu:
>
> Hello,,
>
> My simple understanding of Inferencing is “inferring new facts
> fromexisting facts”. In that sense, I believe that there are some
> similarities of INSERT command in SPARQL.
>
> Can SPARQL be utilised in Inferencing?
>
> Are there any researches in investigating the cons and pros of usingSPARQL
> as reasoner?
>
> Thanks
> Abdul
>
