These kind of messages have been sent by Adrian to pretty much every
list related to rules for at least 15 years. Definitely spam.
Dave
On 21/07/2019 08:35, Lorenz B. wrote:
Ehm, is this supposed to be SPAM? I remember that you also made this
same weird suggestion in a previous thread without given any background
why. And I still don't understand what Executable English is supposed to
be ... I never heard about anybody using it nor do I think that any
customer will think about using it given that - well, let's call it
"quite old" fashioned web appearance ...
So, for me this attempt is more than off-topic. And sorry, I don't want
to be rude, I'm just confused by your messages on the Apache Jena
mailing list, when a user asks for support and not about alternatives
@others: do you know anything about this tool/project/framework whatever?
Hi Pierre,
You may like to write your example in Executable English. (The vocabulary
is open,
so you could also use phrases in French).
Executable English is a platform for cooperative writing of self-serve,
self-explaining analytics in open vocabulary English. It's live online
with many examples. You are cordially invited to write and run your own
examples too. Just point your browser to executable-english.com . Shared
use is free, and there are no commercials.
Enjoy! - Adrian
Adrian Walker
Executable English LLC
San Jose, CA, USA
(USA) 860 830 2085 (California time)
www.executable-english.com
On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 9:48 AM Pierre Grenon <pgre...@horizon-asset.co.uk>
wrote:
Hello,
(I apologise for I am not sure if this has been addressed before and I
have not found the right thread or documentation.)
The configuration file below seems to allow reasoning with either a GRR or
an out of the box reasoner on the same dataset.
However, I don't think it allows combining inferences from both reasoners
at the same time. I am not sure how to achieve this through configuration.
(Happy to provide an example of data and rule for the GRR. I've noticed
this when adding a rule to classify undeclared individuals, i.e.,
individuals appearing in the subject position of a triple. The rule to the
effect that if they do, they are instances of a class A. It is possible to
derive the instantiation. However, it is not possible to combine it with
type inheritance from a reasoner. If class A is a subclass of class B,
there is no inference to the effect that the individual is also an instance
of class B.)
With many thanks and kind regards,
Pierre
-----
@prefix : <http://base/#> .
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix tdb2: <http://jena.apache.org/2016/tdb#> .
@prefix ja: <http://jena.hpl.hp.com/2005/11/Assembler#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix fuseki: <http://jena.apache.org/fuseki#> .
:theService a fuseki:Service ;
rdfs:label "Service with update and query to
test minimal dataset with inference using an instance of generic rule
reasoner and RDFSExptRuleReasoner" ;
fuseki:dataset :theDataset ;
#:tdb_dataset_readwrite ;
fuseki:name "Conference2" ;
fuseki:serviceQuery "query" , "sparql" ;
fuseki:serviceReadGraphStore "get" ;
fuseki:serviceReadWriteGraphStore
"data" ;
fuseki:serviceUpdate "update" ;
fuseki:serviceUpload "upload" .
:theDataset a ja:RDFDataset ;
ja:defaultGraph <#theUnionModel>
.
<#theUnionModel> a ja:UnionModel ;
ja:rootModel <#theRootModel> ;
ja:subModel <#theModel_GRR> , <#theModel_RDFS> .
<#theRootModel> a ja:Model ;
ja:baseModel <#theGraph> ;
.
<#theModel_GRR> a ja:InfModel ;
ja:baseModel <#theGraph> ;
ja:reasoner [
ja:reasonerURL <
http://jena.hpl.hp.com/2003/GenericRuleReasoner> ;
ja:rulesFrom
<file:///C:/dev/apache-jena-fuseki-3.10.0/data/conference/conference1.rules>
] ;
.
THIS E-MAIL MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR PRIVILEGED INFORMATION.
IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT (OR HAVE RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL
IN ERROR) PLEASE NOTIFY THE SENDER IMMEDIATELY AND DESTROY THIS
E-MAIL. ANY UNAUTHORISED COPYING, DISCLOSURE OR DISTRIBUTION OF THE
MATERIAL IN THIS E-MAIL IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH MIFID II RULES ON INDUCEMENTS, THE FIRM'S EMPLOYEES
MAY ATTEND CORPORATE ACCESS EVENTS (DEFINED IN THE FCA HANDBOOK AS
"THE SERVICE OF ARRANGING OR BRINGING ABOUT CONTACT BETWEEN AN INVESTMENT
MANAGER AND AN ISSUER OR POTENTIAL ISSUER"). DURING SUCH MEETINGS, THE
FIRM'S EMPLOYEES MAY ON NO ACCOUNT BE IN RECEIPT OF INSIDE INFORMATION
(AS DESCRIBED IN ARTICLE 7 OF THE MARKET ABUSE REGULATION (EU) NO
596/2014).
(https://www.handbook.fca.org.uk/handbook/glossary/G3532m.html)
COMPANIES WHO DISCLOSE INSIDE INFORMATION ARE IN BREACH OF REGULATION
AND MUST IMMEDIATELY AND CLEARLY NOTIFY ALL ATTENDEES. FOR INFORMATION
ON THE FIRM'S POLICY IN RELATION TO ITS PARTICIPATION IN MARKET SOUNDINGS,
PLEASE SEE https://www.horizon-asset.co.uk/market-soundings/.
HORIZON ASSET LLP IS AUTHORISED AND REGULATED
BY THE FINANCIAL CONDUCT AUTHORITY.
