Hello,

I hit to something strange and I wonder if this is some bug to be fixed.

If I read the attached rdf which now has only 2 elements which are the same 
with the only difference that one has “cims:isFixed”.

Below I pasted what I am getting in ModelCom. There are some GUIDs appearing and

The iteration of model.listSubjects().next().getRequiredProperty(RDF.type) 
fails as

org.apache.jena.shared.PropertyNotFoundException: 
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type





If it really a bug and how this could be fixed?

It seems it does not related to cims: as there are other cims and it is all 
fine with them.

<cims:isFixed rdfs:Literal="XYZ" />

It seems that rdfs:Literal is not treated.

Regards
Chavdar


The ModelCom is in case there is isFixed in the rdf

<ModelCom   {63ded209-84f9-44cf-a61e-7d7ce8b22630 @rdfs:Literal "XYZ"; 
cim:Breaker.OperatedBy @rdf:type rdf:Property; cim:Breaker.OperatedBy 
@cims:isFixed 63ded209-84f9-44cf-a61e-7d7ce8b22630; cim:Breaker.OperatedBy 
@rdfs:comment "\"Circuit breakers may be operated by
       protection relays.\""; cim:Breaker.OperatedBy @cims:multiplicity 
http://www.cim-logic.com/schema/990530#M:0..n; cim:Breaker.OperatedBy 
@cims:inverseRoleName cim:ProtectionEquipment.Operates; cim:Breaker.OperatedBy 
@rdfs:range cim:ProtectionEquipment; cim:Breaker.OperatedBy @rdfs:domain 
cim:Breaker; cim:Breaker.OperatedBy @rdfs:label "OperatedBy"@en} |  
[63ded209-84f9-44cf-a61e-7d7ce8b22630, 
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#Literal, "XYZ"] 
[http://iec.ch/TC57/CIM100#Breaker.OperatedBy, 
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type, 
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#Property] 
[http://iec.ch/TC57/CIM100#Breaker.OperatedBy, 
http://iec.ch/TC57/1999/rdf-schema-extensions-19990926#isFixed, 
63ded209-84f9-44cf-a61e-7d7ce8b22630] 
[http://iec.ch/TC57/CIM100#Breaker.OperatedBy, 
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment, "\"Circuit breakers may be 
operated by
       protection relays.\""] [http://iec.ch/TC57/CIM100#Breaker.OperatedBy, 
http://iec.ch/TC57/1999/rdf-schema-extensions-19990926#multiplicity, 
http://www.cim-logic.com/schema/990530#M:0..n] 
[http://iec.ch/TC57/CIM100#Breaker.OperatedBy, 
http://iec.ch/TC57/1999/rdf-schema-extensions-19990926#inverseRoleName, 
http://iec.ch/TC57/CIM100#ProtectionEquipment.Operates] 
[http://iec.ch/TC57/CIM100#Breaker.OperatedBy, 
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#range, 
http://iec.ch/TC57/CIM100#ProtectionEquipment] 
[http://iec.ch/TC57/CIM100#Breaker.OperatedBy, 
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#domain, http://iec.ch/TC57/CIM100#Breaker] 
[http://iec.ch/TC57/CIM100#Breaker.OperatedBy, 
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label, "OperatedBy"@en]>


If I delete the isFixed the result is
<ModelCom   {cim:Breaker.OperatedBy @rdf:type rdf:Property; 
cim:Breaker.OperatedBy @rdfs:comment "\"Circuit breakers may be operated by
       protection relays.\""; cim:Breaker.OperatedBy @cims:multiplicity 
http://www.cim-logic.com/schema/990530#M:0..n; cim:Breaker.OperatedBy 
@cims:inverseRoleName cim:ProtectionEquipment.Operates; cim:Breaker.OperatedBy 
@rdfs:range cim:ProtectionEquipment; cim:Breaker.OperatedBy @rdfs:domain 
cim:Breaker; cim:Breaker.OperatedBy @rdfs:label "OperatedBy"@en} |  
[http://iec.ch/TC57/CIM100#Breaker.OperatedBy, 
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type, 
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#Property] 
[http://iec.ch/TC57/CIM100#Breaker.OperatedBy, 
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment, "\"Circuit breakers may be 
operated by
       protection relays.\""] [http://iec.ch/TC57/CIM100#Breaker.OperatedBy, 
http://iec.ch/TC57/1999/rdf-schema-extensions-19990926#multiplicity, 
http://www.cim-logic.com/schema/990530#M:0..n] 
[http://iec.ch/TC57/CIM100#Breaker.OperatedBy, 
http://iec.ch/TC57/1999/rdf-schema-extensions-19990926#inverseRoleName, 
http://iec.ch/TC57/CIM100#ProtectionEquipment.Operates] 
[http://iec.ch/TC57/CIM100#Breaker.OperatedBy, 
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#range, 
http://iec.ch/TC57/CIM100#ProtectionEquipment] 
[http://iec.ch/TC57/CIM100#Breaker.OperatedBy, 
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#domain, http://iec.ch/TC57/CIM100#Breaker] 
[http://iec.ch/TC57/CIM100#Breaker.OperatedBy, 
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label, "OperatedBy"@en]>

Reply via email to