Hi Andy,

Thank you for all these detailed and precise explanations.
Problem solved.

Regards!


Le jeu. 7 sept. 2023 à 17:27, Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> a écrit :
>
> On 07/09/2023 15:54, mbk wrote:
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > We generate a RDF/XML file which has all its resources with the
> > 'rdf:about' attribute. We would like to replace this attribute with 'rdf:id'
> >
> > Using apache-jena 3.17.0 We create ressource with
> > model.createResource(uri,res) where uri is an UUID with prefix '_'
> > (_04f2f0d3-10f4-4248-a7fc-fc8243ec7250) and res os a ressource from a
> > vocabulary. The ressource node in generated file has rdf:about atribute.
> > We like to have rdf:ID instead
>
> Hi,
>
> Is that a URI of <_:04f2f0d3-10f4-4248-a7fc-fc8243ec7250> or
> <_04f2f0d3-10f4-4248-a7fc-fc8243ec7250
>
> The first is not a legal URI - the scheme name "_" isn't legal. It's not
> a blank node either because the argument string is interpreted as a URI.
>
> The second is a relative URI which when used in RDF/XML will be resolved
> against the base URI.
>
> You should use a full URI in a call to model.createResource.
>
> rdf:ID (on nodes) will become an URI fragment and also be resolved.
>
> rdf:ID="abc" is much the same as rdf:about="#abc".
>
>
> Do you have an minimal example of what you are trying to achieve and
> what you currently get?
>
> Is this related to:
>
> https://github.com/apache/jena/issues/2007
>
>  > Using apache-jena 3.17.0
>
> released 2020-11-25
>
> For security reasons (including with RDF/XML), you should upgrade to
> Jena 4.9.0
>
>      Andy
>
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >

Reply via email to