*not* rdf:datatype
On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 7:10 PM Martynas Jusevičius <[email protected]> wrote: > > AFAIK for XMLLiterals you need to use rdf:parseType="Literal", rdf:datatype: > https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/#section-Syntax-XML-literals > > On Fri, 19 Apr 2024 at 18.18, Thomas Francart <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Hello >> >> The RDF/XML parsing of the following succeeds: >> >> <rdf:Description> >> >> <epvoc:decisionAboutId rdf:parseType="literal"><am><reference><symbol href=" >> https://xx.xx.xx/PC"/></reference></am></epvoc:decisionAboutId> >> >> </rdf:Description> >> >> while the RDF/XML parsing of this gives an error : in that case the XML has >> simply be encoded with <, and > and the rdf:datatype has been >> explicitly set to XMLLiteral : >> >> <rdf:Description> >> >> <epvoc:decisionAboutId rdf:datatype=" >> http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#XMLLiteral";><am><reference><symbol >> href="https://xx.xx.xx/PC >> "/></reference></am></epvoc:decisionAboutId> >> >> </rdf:Description> >> >> >> The error is >> >> 13:08:04.742 WARN org.apache.jena.riot - Lexical form >> '<am><reference><symbol href="https://xx.xx.xx/PC"/></reference></am>' not >> valid for datatype XSD XMLLiteral >> >> and then further down in SPARQL queries: >> >> 13:08:04.775 WARN o.apache.jena.sparql.expr.NodeValue - Datatype format >> exception: "<am><reference><symbol href=\"https://xx.xx.xx/PC\ >> "/></reference></am>"^^rdf:XMLLiteral >> >> The encoded XML is however valid. >> >> Is it possible to explicitely create literals with XMLLiteral datatype in >> RDF/XML by setting this datatype explicitely ? >> >> Thanks >> Thomas >> >> >> -- >> >> *Thomas Francart* -* SPARNA* >> Web de *données* | Architecture de l'*information* | Accès aux >> *connaissances* >> blog : blog.sparna.fr, site : sparna.fr, linkedin : >> fr.linkedin.com/in/thomasfrancart >> tel : +33 (0)6.71.11.25.97, skype : francartthomas
