That's the reference I was looking for. Thank you!

On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 10:31 AM Simon Bin <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Read closely
> https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/#section-Serialising
>
> not all RDF graphs can be represented in RDF/XML
>
> Cheers,
>
> On Thu, 2024-09-26 at 10:06 -0400, Luke VanderHart wrote:
> > That's a straightforward workaround, as is using a completely
> > different
> > IRI. I can certainly get my app working.
> >
> > I'm more concerned that either I'm missing some aspect of the RDF/XML
> > spec,
> > or that there might be a bug in Jena.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 10:02 AM Holger Knublauch
> > <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Just prepend a letter?
> > >
> > > Sent from my iPhone
> > >
> > > > On 26.09.2024, at 15:37, Luke VanderHart <[email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I'm trying to use Jena to write RDF/XML. The graph I'm writing
> > > > contains
> > > a
> > > > triple with an IRI node used in predicate position:
> > > > "urn:uuid:29ec95c1-034b-4d8a-ba48-c50f0f9dd269".
> > > >
> > > > Jena throws an exception when trying to write this graph to
> > > > RDF/XML. Upon
> > > > debugging, the cause is that ModelCom.listNameSpaces is trying to
> > > > parse
> > > out
> > > > the namespace of all the predicates in the graph using
> > > > org.apache.jena.util.SplitIRI.splitXML method.
> > > >
> > > > This method is splitting the URI at index 11, yielding an invalid
> > > > URI
> > > > `urn:uuid:29` which later fails validation and throws an
> > > > exception. This
> > > is
> > > > because the UUID starts with numeric characters which are not
> > > > valid
> > > initial
> > > > characters for a NCName.
> > > >
> > > > I feel like I'm missing something. Is there some aspect of the
> > > > specification that normally prohibits using UUID URNs in
> > > > predicate
> > > > position? Or am I doing something else wrong? Or is this an
> > > > actual edge
> > > > case bug that I should file a bug report for?
> > > >
> > > > Any insight would be much appreciated. Thank you!
> > > >
> > > > - Luke
> > >
>
>

Reply via email to