we would be very happy to contribute. However a description of the current plan and status regarding tooling would be helpful. It would speed up the learning curve. You mentioned some jira tickets?
(maybe I should sign up to the developer mailing list and take the conversation over there) On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Gwen Shapira <gshap...@cloudera.com> wrote: > Since these tools are so useful, I wonder what it requires (from both > Airbnb and Kafka) to merge this into Kafka project. I think there are > couple of Jira regarding improved tool usability that this resolved. > > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Alexis Midon > <alexis.mi...@airbedandbreakfast.com> wrote: > > distribution will be even based on the number of partitions. > > It is the same logic as AdminUtils. > > see > > > https://github.com/airbnb/kafkat/blob/master/lib/kafkat/command/reassign.rb#L39 > > > > On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Neha Narkhede <neha.narkh...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> This is great. Thanks for sharing! Does kafkat automatically figure out > the > >> right reassignment strategy based on even data distribution? > >> > >> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 12:12 AM, Alexis Midon < > >> alexis.mi...@airbedandbreakfast.com> wrote: > >> > >> > Hi Marcin, > >> > > >> > A few weeks ago, I did an upgrade to 0.8.1.1 and then augmented the > >> cluster > >> > from 3 to 9 brokers. All went smoothly. > >> > In a dev environment, we found out that the biggest pain point is to > have > >> > to deal with the json file and the error-prone command line interface. > >> > So to make our life easier, my team mate Nelson [1] came up with > kafkat: > >> > https://github.com/airbnb/kafkat > >> > > >> > We now install kafkat on every broker. Note that kafkat does NOT > connect > >> to > >> > a broker, but to zookeeper. So you can actually use it from any > machine. > >> > > >> > For reassignment, please see: > >> > `kafkat reassign [topic] [--brokers <ids>] [--replicas <n>] ` > >> > It will transparently generate and kick off a balanced assignment. > >> > > >> > feedback and contributions welcome! Enjoy! > >> > > >> > Alexis > >> > > >> > [1] https://github.com/nelgau > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Marcin Michalski < > >> mmichal...@tagged.com> > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > I am running on 0.8.1.1 and I thought that the partition > reassignment > >> > tools > >> > > can do this job. Just was not sure if this is the best way to do > this. > >> > > I will try this out in stage env first and will perform the same in > >> prod. > >> > > > >> > > Thanks, > >> > > marcin > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 7:23 PM, Joe Stein <joe.st...@stealth.ly> > >> wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > Marcin, that is a typical task now. What version of Kafka are you > >> > > running? > >> > > > > >> > > > Take a look at > >> > > > > >> > > https://kafka.apache.org/documentation.html#basic_ops_cluster_expansion > >> > > > and > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://kafka.apache.org/documentation.html#basic_ops_increase_replication_factor > >> > > > > >> > > > Basically you can do a --generate to get existing JSON topology > and > >> > with > >> > > > that take the results of "Current partition replica assignment" > (the > >> > > first > >> > > > JSON that outputs) and make whatever changes (like sed old node > for > >> new > >> > > > node and add more replica's which increase the replication factor, > >> > > whatever > >> > > > you want) and then --execute. > >> > > > > >> > > > With lots of data this takes time so you will want to run > --verify to > >> > see > >> > > > what is in progress... good thing do a node at a time (even topic > at > >> a > >> > > > time) however you want to manage and wait for it as such. > >> > > > > >> > > > The "preferred" replica is simply the first one in the list of > >> > replicas. > >> > > > The kafka-preferred-replica-election.sh just makes that replica > the > >> > > leader > >> > > > as this is not automatic yet. > >> > > > > >> > > > If you are running a version prior to 0.8.1.1 it might make sense > to > >> > > > upgrade the old nodes first then run reassign to the new servers. > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > /******************************************* > >> > > > Joe Stein > >> > > > Founder, Principal Consultant > >> > > > Big Data Open Source Security LLC > >> > > > http://www.stealth.ly > >> > > > Twitter: @allthingshadoop < > http://www.twitter.com/allthingshadoop> > >> > > > ********************************************/ > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Marcin Michalski < > >> > mmichal...@tagged.com > >> > > > > >> > > > wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > > Hi, I would like to migrate my Kafka setup from old servers to > new > >> > > > servers. > >> > > > > Let say I have 8 really old servers that have the kafka > >> > > topics/partitions > >> > > > > replicated 4 ways and want to migrate the data to 4 brand new > >> servers > >> > > and > >> > > > > want the replication factor be 3. I wonder if anyone has ever > >> > performed > >> > > > > this type of migration? > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Will auto rebalancing take care of this automatically if I do > the > >> > > > > following? > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Let say I bring down old broker id 1 down and startup new server > >> > broker > >> > > > id > >> > > > > 100 up, is there a way to migrate all of the data of the topic > that > >> > had > >> > > > the > >> > > > > topic (where borker id 1 was the leader) over to the new broker > >> 100? > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Or do I need to use *bin/kafka-preferred-replica-election.sh *to > >> > > reassign > >> > > > > the topics/partitions from old broker 1 to broker 100? And then > >> just > >> > > keep > >> > > > > doing the same thing until all of the old brokers are > >> decommissioned? > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Also, would kafka-preferred-replica-election.sh let me actually > >> lower > >> > > the > >> > > > > number of replicas as well, if I just simply make sure that > given > >> > > > > topic/partition was only elected 3 times versus 4? > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Thanks for your insight, > >> > > > > Marcin > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> >