Thanks Todd. that will work On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:31 PM, Todd Palino <tpal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In order to do that, you'll need to run it and parse the output, and then > emit it to your metrics system of choice. This is essentially what I do - I > have a monitoring application which runs every minute and pulls the offsets > for a select set of topics and consumers, and then packages up the metrics > and sends them to our internal system. > > It's not ideal. We're working on a script to calculate lag efficiently for > all consumers who commit offsets to Kafka, rather than a select set. > > -Todd > > > On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 12:27 AM, tao xiao <xiaotao...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Thank you Todd for your detailed explanation. Currently I export all > > metrics to graphite using the reporter configuration. is there a way I > can > > do similar thing with offset checker? > > > > On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Todd Palino <tpal...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > The reason for this is the mechanic by which each of the lags are > > > calculated. MaxLag (and the FetcherLagMetric) are calculated by the > > > consumer itself using the difference between the offset it knows it is > > at, > > > and the offset that the broker has as the end of the partition. The > > offset > > > checker, however, uses the last offset that the consumer committed. > > > Depending on your configuration, this is somewhere behind where the > > > consumer actually is. For example, if your commit interval is set to 10 > > > minutes, the number used by the offset checker can be up to 10 minutes > > > behind where it actually is. > > > > > > So while MaxLag may be more up to date at any given time, it's actually > > > less accurate. Because MaxLag relies on the consumer to report it, if > the > > > consumer breaks, you will not see an accurate lag number. This is why > > when > > > we are checking consumer lag, we use an external process that uses the > > > committed consumer offsets. This allows us to catch a broken consumer, > as > > > well as an active consumer that is just falling behind. > > > > > > -Todd > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 9:34 PM, tao xiao <xiaotao...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > Thanks Joel. But I discover that both MaxLag and FetcherLagMetrics > are > > > > always > > > > much smaller than the lag shown in offset checker. any reason? > > > > > > > > On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 7:22 AM, Joel Koshy <jjkosh...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > There are FetcherLagMetrics that you can take a look at. However, > it > > > > > is probably easiest to just monitor MaxLag as that reports the > > maximum > > > > > of all the lag metrics. > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 05:03:28PM +0800, tao xiao wrote: > > > > > > Hi team, > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there a metric that shows the consumer lag of a particular > > > consumer > > > > > > group? similar to what offset checker provides > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Tao > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Regards, > > > > Tao > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Tao > > > -- Regards, Tao
