I think you can also set this dynamically via an mbean
(kafka.Log4jController)

On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 08:26:00PM +0000, Jiangjie Qin wrote:
> Actually the name should be log4j.logger.kafka.network.RequestChannel$
> It should be there in 0.8.2.1. Can you check it again?
> 
> From: Charlie Mason <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
> Reply-To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
> Date: Thursday, May 28, 2015 at 1:09 PM
> To: Jiangjie Qin <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
> Cc: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
> Subject: Re: Kafka Not Commiting Messages
> 
> Hi Jiangjie,
> 
> Thanks for you message. Unfortunately there doesn't appear to have that 
> setting in log4j.properties in Kafka 0.8.2.1.
> 
> I tried adding that property to the log file however it doesn't seem to have 
> any effect.
> 
> Is there a different logger I need to configure for 0.8.2.1?
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Charlie M
> 
> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 1:15 AM, Jiangjie Qin 
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Can you turn on TRACE level logging for kafka-request.log and see if
> broker received the producer request or not?
> You can go to KAKFA_FOLDER/config/log4j.properties and change
> log4j.logger.kafka.network.RequestChannels to TRACE.
> 
> Jiangjie (Becket) Qin
> 
> On 5/27/15, 12:12 PM, "Charlie Mason" 
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
> >Hi All,
> >
> >So I have done some more tests and found something I really don't
> >understand.
> >
> >I found a simple example of the Kafka Java producer so I ran that pointing
> >at the same topic as my last test. That failed when run from my local
> >machine. I uploaded it to the VM where Kafka is installed and it worked
> >perfectly. Bare in mind this exactly the same code configured to talk to
> >exactly the same IP address.
> >
> >The thing I don't understand is I can see a connection via Wireshark to
> >Kafka when the code is running on my machine. I can even query for the
> >topic metadata successfully from my local machine. The only thing it won't
> >do is commit a message. From what I have read the Kafka protocol is a
> >fairly straight forward single TCP connection to the server from the
> >client.
> >
> >Does anyone have any ideas what be causing this? Obviously people run in
> >production with the producer on different nodes from the brokers, so I
> >can't see whats different here.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >Charlie M
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Charlie Mason 
> ><[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> I have been trying to get started with Kafka. I have set up an 0.8.2
> >> broker as per the quick start. With a single node broker I am able to
> >>run
> >> the scripts in the bin folder to successfully produce and consume
> >>messages.
> >>
> >> I then tried to write some Scala code to use the new 0.8 Producer API to
> >> produce messages. However nothing seems to appear on the consumer. I
> >> modified the producer code to wait for the broker's metadata response.
> >>That
> >> blocks and then times out.
> >>
> >> The only difference I can see apart from using the new Producer API is
> >>all
> >> my previous tests were run inside the VM Kafka is installed on. Where
> >>as my
> >> code is running on the host machine and connecting into Kafka. I put
> >>some
> >> code into get the topics metadata to confirm connectivity to Kafka. That
> >> prints the topic metadata correctly before hanging on the
> >>send(...).get().
> >> I have also checked the topic is set for a replication factor of 1. I
> >>can't
> >> see anything in the Kafka logs either. All I see on the broker is a
> >>message
> >> when the Producer times out saying the client disconnected.
> >>
> >> Anyone got any ideas what might be making Kafka fail to commit the
> >> messages?
> >>
> >> I really want to start playing with Kafka however I seem to have fallen
> >>at
> >> the first hurdle.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Charlie M
> >>
> 
> 

-- 
Joel

Reply via email to