Hi Gwen,
Yes, we're going to upgrade the 0.9.0 version. Regarding the upgrade, we
definitely don't want to have down time of our cluster.
So the upgrade will be machine by machine. Will the release 0.9.0 work with
the Aug's version together in the same Kafka cluster?
Also we currently run spark streaming job (with scala 2.10) against the
cluster. Any known issues of 0.9.0 are you aware of under this scenario?
Thanks,
Tony
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io> wrote:
> We fixed many many bugs since August. Since we are about to release 0.9.0
> (with SSL!), maybe wait a day and go with a released and tested version.
>
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Qi Xu <shkir...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Forgot to mention is that the Kafka version we're using is from Aug's
> > Trunk branch---which has the SSL support.
> >
> > Thanks again,
> > Qi
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Qi Xu <shkir...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Loop another guy from our team.
> >>
> >> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Qi Xu <shkir...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi folks,
> >>> We have a 10 node cluster and have several topics. Each topic has about
> >>> 256 partitions with 3 replica factor. Now we run into an issue that in
> some
> >>> topic, a few partition (< 10)'s leader is -1 and all of them has only
> one
> >>> synced partition.
> >>>
> >>> From the Kafka manager, here's the snapshot:
> >>> [image: Inline image 2]
> >>>
> >>> [image: Inline image 1]
> >>>
> >>> here's the state log:
> >>> [2015-11-23 21:57:58,598] ERROR Controller 1 epoch 435499 initiated
> >>> state change for partition [userlogs,84] from OnlinePartition to
> >>> OnlinePartition failed (state.change.logger)
> >>> kafka.common.StateChangeFailedException: encountered error while
> >>> electing leader for partition [userlogs,84] due to: Preferred replica
> 0 for
> >>> partition [userlogs,84] is either not alive or not in the isr. Current
> >>> leader and ISR: [{"leader":-1,"leader_epoch":203,"isr":[1]}].
> >>> Caused by: kafka.common.StateChangeFailedException: Preferred replica 0
> >>> for partition [userlogs,84] is either not alive or not in the isr.
> Current
> >>> leader and ISR: [{"leader":-1,"leader_epoch":203,"isr":[1]}]
> >>>
> >>> My question is:
> >>> 1) how could this happen and how can I fix it or work around it?
> >>> 2) Is 256 partitions too big? We have about 200+ cores for spark
> >>> streaming job.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Qi
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
