Hi Tao, On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 2:25 AM, tao xiao <xiaotao...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The PR provides a new SASL mech but it doesn't provide a pluggable way to > implement user's own logic to do authentication. So I don't think the PR > will meet my need. > Yes, as I said, that would not be enough for your use-case. But it will allow a SASL mechanism to be specified via a config. In theory, you could extend that to allow user classes to implement SASL mechanisms. Anyway, I am not suggesting that this is better than having pluggable ChannelBuilder implementations, just that it's an alternative (which was your question :)). I will write a KIP to open the discussion. > OK. p.s. Ismael, can you grant me the permission to create a KIP in Kafka space? > I don't have the permissions to do it, sorry. Guozhang has done it though. :) Ismael
