Ok I'll create a JIRA issue on this.

Thanks!

2016-01-23 21:47 GMT+01:00 Bruno Rassaerts <bruno.rassae...@novazone.be>:

> +1 here
>
> As a workaround we seek to the current offset which resets the current
> clients internal states and everything continues.
>
> Regards,
> Bruno Rassaerts | Freelance Java Developer
>
> Novazone, Edingsesteenweg 302, B-1755 Gooik, Belgium
> T: +32(0)54/26.02.03 - M:+32(0)477/39.01.15
> bruno.rassae...@novazone.be -www.novazone.be
>
> > On 23 Jan 2016, at 17:52, Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Can you please file an issue in JIRA so that we make sure this is
> > investigated?
> >
> > Ismael
> >
> >> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Han JU <ju.han.fe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'm prototyping with the new consumer API of kafka 0.9 and I'm
> particularly
> >> interested in the `ConsumerRebalanceListener`.
> >>
> >> My test setup is like the following:
> >>  - 5M messages pre-loaded in one node kafka 0.9
> >>  - 12 partitions, auto offset commit set to false
> >>  - in `onPartitionsRevoked`, commit offset and flush the local state
> >>
> >> The test run is like the following:
> >>  - launch one process with 2 consumers and let it consume for a while
> >>  - launch another process with 2 consumers, this triggers a rebalancing,
> >> and let these 2 processes run until messages are all consumed
> >>
> >> The code is here: https://gist.github.com/darkjh/fe1e5a5387bf13b4d4dd
> >>
> >> So at first, the 2 consumers of the first process each got 6 partitions.
> >> And after the rebalancing, each consumer got 3 partitions. It's
> confirmed
> >> by logging inside the `onPartitionAssigned` callback.
> >>
> >> But after the rebalancing, one of the 2 consumers of the first process
> stop
> >> receiving messages, even if it has partitions assigned to:
> >>
> >> balance-1 pulled 7237 msgs ...
> >> balance-0 pulled 7263 msgs ...
> >> 2016-01-22 15:50:37,533 [INFO] [pool-1-thread-2]
> >> o.a.k.c.c.i.AbstractCoordinator - Attempt to heart beat failed since the
> >> group is rebalancing, try to re-join group.
> >> balance-1 flush @ 536637
> >> balance-1 committed offset for List(balance-11, balance-10, balance-9,
> >> balance-8, balance-7, balance-6)
> >> 2016-01-22 15:50:37,575 [INFO] [pool-1-thread-1]
> >> o.a.k.c.c.i.AbstractCoordinator - Attempt to heart beat failed since the
> >> group is rebalancing, try to re-join group.
> >> balance-0 flush @ 543845
> >> balance-0 committed offset for List(balance-5, balance-4, balance-3,
> >> balance-2, balance-1, balance-0)
> >> balance-0 got assigned List(balance-5, balance-4, balance-3)
> >> balance-1 got assigned List(balance-11, balance-10, balance-9)
> >> balance-1 pulled 3625 msgs ...
> >> balance-0 pulled 3621 msgs ...
> >> balance-0 pulled 3631 msgs ...
> >> balance-0 pulled 3631 msgs ...
> >> balance-1 pulled 0 msgs ...
> >> balance-0 pulled 3643 msgs ...
> >> balance-0 pulled 3643 msgs ...
> >> balance-1 pulled 0 msgs ...
> >> balance-0 pulled 3622 msgs ...
> >> balance-0 pulled 3632 msgs ...
> >> balance-1 pulled 0 msgs ...
> >> balance-0 pulled 3637 msgs ...
> >> balance-0 pulled 3641 msgs ...
> >> balance-0 pulled 3640 msgs ...
> >> balance-1 pulled 0 msgs ...
> >> balance-0 pulled 3632 msgs ...
> >> balance-0 pulled 3630 msgs ...
> >> balance-1 pulled 0 msgs ...
> >> ......
> >>
> >> `balance-0` and `balance-1` are the names of the consumer thread. So
> after
> >> the rebalancing, thread `balance-1` continues to poll but no message
> >> arrive, given that it has got 3 partitions assigned to after the
> >> rebalancing.
> >>
> >> Finally other 3 consumers pulls all their partitions' message, the
> >> situation is like
> >>
> >> GROUP, TOPIC, PARTITION, CURRENT OFFSET, LOG END OFFSET, LAG, OWNER
> >> balance-test, balance, 9, 417467, 417467, 0, consumer-2_/127.0.0.1
> >> balance-test, balance, 10, 417467, 417467, 0, consumer-2_/127.0.0.1
> >> balance-test, balance, 11, 417467, 417467, 0, consumer-2_/127.0.0.1
> >> balance-test, balance, 6, 180269, 417467, 237198, consumer-2_/127.0.0.1
> >> balance-test, balance, 7, 180036, 417468, 237432, consumer-2_/127.0.0.1
> >> balance-test, balance, 8, 180197, 417467, 237270, consumer-2_/127.0.0.1
> >> balance-test, balance, 3, 417467, 417467, 0, consumer-1_/127.0.0.1
> >> balance-test, balance, 4, 417468, 417468, 0, consumer-1_/127.0.0.1
> >> balance-test, balance, 5, 417468, 417468, 0, consumer-1_/127.0.0.1
> >> balance-test, balance, 0, 417467, 417467, 0, consumer-1_/127.0.0.1
> >> balance-test, balance, 1, 417467, 417467, 0, consumer-1_/127.0.0.1
> >> balance-test, balance, 2, 417467, 417467, 0, consumer-1_/127.0.0.1
> >>
> >> So you can see, partition [6, 7, 8] still has messages, but the consumer
> >> can't pull them after the rebalancing.
> >>
> >> I've tried 0.9.0.0 release, trunk and 0.9.0 branch, for both
> server/broker
> >> and client.
> >>
> >> I hope the code is clear enough to illustrate/reproduce the problem.
> It's
> >> quite a surprise for me because this is the main feature of the new
> >> consumer API, but it does not seem to work properly.
> >> Feel free to talk to me for any details.
> >> --
> >> *JU Han*
> >>
> >> Software Engineer @ Teads.tv
> >>
> >> +33 0619608888
> >>
>



-- 
*JU Han*

Software Engineer @ Teads.tv

+33 0619608888

Reply via email to