Hi Raj and Tao, I just merged the KAFKA-3112 PR, so this issue will be fixed in 0.10.0.0.
Thanks, Ismael On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 7:47 PM, tao xiao <xiaotao...@gmail.com> wrote: > KAFKA-2657 is unresolved so you can safely assume it hasn't been fixed yet. > > On Fri, 6 May 2016 at 07:38 Raj Tanneru <rtann...@fanatics.com> wrote: > > > Yeah it is a duplicate of KAFKA-2657. The question is how to check / know > > if it is merged to 0.9.0.1 release. What are the options that I have if I > > need this fix. How can I get patch for this on 0.8.2.1? > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > > On May 6, 2016, at 12:06 AM, tao xiao <xiaotao...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > It said this is a duplication. This is the > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2657 that KAKFA-3112 > > duplicates > > > to. > > > > > >> On Thu, 5 May 2016 at 22:13 Raj Tanneru <rtann...@fanatics.com> > wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >> Hi All, > > >> Does anyone know if KAFKA-3112 is merged to 0.9.0.1? Is there a place > to > > >> check which version has this fix? Jira doesn’t show fix versions. > > >> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3112 > > >> > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> Raj Tanneru > > >> Information contained in this e-mail message is confidential. This > > e-mail > > >> message is intended only for the personal use of the recipient(s) > named > > >> above. If you are not an intended recipient, do not read, distribute > or > > >> reproduce this transmission (including any attachments). If you have > > >> received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by > > email > > >> reply and delete the original message. > > >> > > Information contained in this e-mail message is confidential. This e-mail > > message is intended only for the personal use of the recipient(s) named > > above. If you are not an intended recipient, do not read, distribute or > > reproduce this transmission (including any attachments). If you have > > received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by > email > > reply and delete the original message. > > >
